Checklist: Secure and FedRAMP-Aware Enrollment Software Procurement

Hook: Stop guessing — buy enrollment software that protects student data and survives audits

If your institution is still evaluating enrollment or document-management platforms without a security-first procurement checklist, you’re taking an unnecessary risk with student data, compliance, and enrollment conversion. In 2026, higher ed and K–12 IT teams increasingly require vendors with FedRAMP-aware controls, clear evidence of continuous monitoring, and contractual guardrails for privacy and incident response. This article gives a practical, FedRAMP-contextualized procurement checklist — including red flags and vendor questions — so you can select secure, compliant enrollment software that boosts conversions and reduces downtime.

Most important takeaway (lead with the conclusion)

Prioritize vendors that can produce a FedRAMP package or equivalent evidence (SSP, POA&M, ATO artifacts), integrate with Zero Trust identity flows, and prove long-term operational stability. Use the checklist below to map security requirements to functional enrollment needs (SIS integration, document workflows, e-signature, FERPA handling). Beware of vendors that use FedRAMP-branded marketing without deliverable artifacts or transparent subcontractor lists.

Context: Why FedRAMP awareness matters for enrollment software in 2026

FedRAMP started as a federal cloud authorization program, but by 2025–26 its influence expanded across state & local education agencies and large institutions that demand standardized security evidence. The program’s emphasis on continuous monitoring, NIST-aligned controls (SP 800-53 rev.5 influence), and supply chain scrutiny makes FedRAMP artifacts valuable for procurement teams even when you don’t need an official federal ATO.

Vendors like BigBear.ai have reshaped the market by acquiring FedRAMP-authorized technology in late 2025, demonstrating both the value of FedRAMP-approved platforms and the acquisition risk profile that procurement teams must consider. That deal underscores two realities for 2026 buyers: FedRAMP authorization adds market value — and vendor financial or strategic changes can create operational risk after procurement.

“BigBear.ai eliminated debt and acquired a FedRAMP-approved AI platform in late 2025, illustrating how FedRAMP authorization is now a strategic differentiator in the marketplace.”

How to use this checklist

Follow this checklist in three passes: 1) must-have security & compliance artifacts, 2) functional controls for enrollment and document handling, 3) commercial and operational protections. Score vendors on each item and require proof before contract signature. Below are sections you can copy into your RFP and demo scripts.

Part A — Core FedRAMP authorization evidence (must-have artifacts)

1. FedRAMP authorization evidence

   • Does the vendor hold a FedRAMP authorization? If yes, ask for the authorization level (Low, Moderate, High) and whether it’s a JAB or Agency authorization.
   • Request the vendor’s System Security Plan (SSP) and the latest Plan of Actions and Milestones (POA&M) under NDA.
   • If the vendor is not FedRAMP authorized, ask for equivalent evidence: SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, and an internal SSP mapped to NIST SP 800-53/800-171.

2. Continuous monitoring & incident response

   • Proof of a continuous monitoring program: CM tools, security event feed to a SIEM, and frequency of scans (vulnerability scanning, control assessments).
   • Incident Response Plan (IRP) with SLA for notification of breaches affecting PII/CUI/FI. Require a maximum notification window (e.g., 72 hours) in the contract.
   • Ask for recent incident examples/redaction-permitted case studies to understand response effectiveness.

3. Third-party assessments and penetration testing

   • Annual third-party penetration test results (redacted) and remediation timelines.
   • Independent attestations: SOC 2 Type II, and any FedRAMP Continuous Monitoring outputs where applicable.

4. Supply chain and subcontractor transparency

   • Complete list of subprocessors and their authorization status (are they FedRAMP-authorized?).
   • SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) or equivalent statement for major components, especially AI models or third-party SDKs.

5. Data classification, residency, and protection

   • Data flow diagrams and classification schema (what is PII, FERPA data, CUI?)
   • Data residency options and mechanisms for regionalized hosting (if needed by your state).
   • Encryption at rest and in transit (TLS 1.2+/AES-256 or equivalent), key management (KMS, HSM, BYOK options).

Part B — Enrollment-specific functionality & security controls

Your procurement must align security controls with the enrollment workflow. Each functional requirement below has a security corollary you should verify.

• SIS and Identity Integration

  • Support for SSO (SAML/OIDC), SCIM for user provisioning, and MFA in all admin flows.
  • Proof of tested integrations with popular SIS platforms (Ellucian, Banner, Workday) and a secure API strategy (rate limits, OAuth2, client credentials).

• Document capture, storage, and e-signatures

  • Document classification and automated redaction for SSNs and sensitive fields.
  • Audit trail for every document: who uploaded, who accessed, and retention/deletion events.
  • E-signature vendor proof (ESIGN/ eIDAS equivalence) and encryption for signed documents.

• Application forms and PII minimization

  • Tooling for dynamic forms that reduce collected PII to the minimum necessary, plus consent capture and versioned consent records.
  • Privacy-by-design documentation showing data minimization and retention default settings.

• Accessibility and user experience (conversion focus)

  • WCAG 2.1 AA compliance validation and a remediation roadmap for accessibility gaps.
  • Prove how security features (MFA, reCAPTCHA, session timeouts) are balanced with conversion-friendly flows.

Part C — Contractual protections and vendor stability

Security controls matter, but they must be backed by contract terms that protect your institution if the vendor fails to perform or changes ownership.

• Exit & data portability clauses

  • Define export formats, test data extraction during pilot, and require vendor-assisted data migration with timelines and costs spelled out.
  • Ask for escrow arrangements for configuration and critical code if the vendor is small or highly dependent on government revenue.

• Liability, indemnity, and cyber insurance

  • Minimum cyber insurance limits and explicit indemnities for data breaches involving student PII/CUI.
  • Cap on liability that is commensurate with the risk — negotiate for exceptions for willful negligence or gross misconduct.

• Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

  • Uptime commitments (99.9%+ typical), incident response SLAs, and credits for downtime impacting enrollment windows.
  • Availability of a dedicated customer success/security contact for escalations during enrollment surges.

• Financial stability & M&A risk

  • Review vendor financials (revenue mix, dependency on government contracts). Acquisitions can change product roadmaps — ask for continuity assurances.
  • BigBear.ai’s late-2025 move to acquire FedRAMP-enabled assets is an example: strategic deals reinforce authorization value but also create transitional risk for customers.

Red flags: When to stop the procurement process

Stop or escalate procurement if any of the following red flags appear. These indicate the vendor may not meet your security and continuity requirements.

• Marketing claims “FedRAMP-compliant” but vendor refuses to share SSP, POA&M, or ATO artifacts under NDA.
• No SOC 2/ISO attestation or refusal to allow a security review or pen test during the pilot phase.
• Opaque subprocessor list or refusal to provide subprocessors’ security posture.
• Vague incident notification timelines or no contractual breach notification window.
• Excessive use of third-party hosted AI models without SBOM or model governance controls — AI supply chain risk is a 2026 priority.
• High concentration of vendor revenue from a single government customer and recent acquisition activity without customer continuity commitments.

Actionable vendor questions to include in your RFP and demos

Copy these directly into RFPs, questionnaires, and live demos. Require documentary evidence and score answers objectively.

1. Do you currently hold a FedRAMP authorization? If yes, what level and which authorizing agency/JAB?
2. Provide an SSP, POA&M, and a summary of continuous monitoring outputs under NDA.
3. Submit the most recent SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 report and your most recent third-party pen test results.
4. List all subprocessors, their roles, and their security certifications/authorizations.
5. Describe encryption in use (algorithms, key management, BYOK/HSM options). Where are keys stored and who controls them?
6. Explain your IRP and breach notification timelines. Provide an example (redacted) of an incident and remediation path.
7. How do you handle FERPA/COPPA/HIPAA data? Provide specific controls for educational PII and CUI segregation.
8. Describe your API security posture (OAuth2, rate limiting, mutual TLS) and provide sample API docs with security sections.
9. What is your data export process and timeline? Demonstrate a test export for a sample dataset during the pilot.
10. Have you undergone a recent merger or acquisition? If so, provide a continuity plan and any changes to the SSP or subcontractor list resulting from the transaction.

Scoring model (simple, practical)

Use a 0–3 scoring scale per item (0 = failed/no evidence, 1 = partial, 2 = acceptable, 3 = best-in-class). Weight critical FedRAMP and incident response items higher (x2). Total scores give a procurement-ready ranking and help justify decisions to leadership.

2026 trends and future predictions you should plan for

These trends shape vendor selection and contract terms for the coming 2–3 years.

• FedRAMP adoption outside federal contracting — states, higher ed systems, and large public universities increasingly require FedRAMP artifacts or FedRAMP-equivalent assurances.
• AI and model governance scrutiny — FedRAMP-authorized AI platforms (like assets acquired in 2025) raise expectations for SBOMs, model lineage, and data provenance controls.
• Zero Trust and continuous ATO — procurement teams will demand Zero Trust integrations (MFA everywhere, least privilege, ephemeral credentials) and faster continuous authorization cycles.
• Supply chain transparency — SBOMs, subprocessors, and dependency disclosures will be standard RFP requirements.
• Data localization and privacy regulation updates — expect more state-level privacy laws affecting FERPA intersections and data residency clauses.

Advanced strategies for institutions (how to win on security + conversion)

Beyond baseline checks, use these strategies to choose software that accelerates enrollment while protecting data.

• Pilot with a security-tempered conversion test: Run your enrollment window on the vendor’s sandbox using a mirrored dataset to measure dropout rates when MFA, step-up auth, or device checks are enabled. If conversion falls sharply, require vendor UX remediation plans.
• Ask for a security & conversion playbook: Vendors who care about enrollment outcomes will provide playbooks combining secure defaults with UX patterns that minimize abandonment.
• Negotiate continuous compliance reporting: Require quarterly compliance snapshots (redacted) and a biannual tabletop incident drill with your security team included.
• Use contract milestones tied to compliance artifacts: Make a portion of payment contingent on delivery of SSP updates, successful pen tests, and proof of remediation of critical findings.

Sample RFP clause (copy/paste ready)

Vendor must provide, under NDA, the most recent System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Actions & Milestones (POA&M). Vendor will notify the institution within 72 hours of any confirmed or suspected breach affecting protected student PII or CUI and will provide a remediation plan within 15 calendar days. Vendor must list all subprocessors and provide evidence of equivalent security posture. Vendor must support data export in open, documented formats within 7 business days of contract termination and provide hands-on data migration assistance for up to 90 days.

Checklist summary (printable action list)

• Obtain SSP + POA&M (or SOC 2 + mapped SSP) — required
• Confirm FedRAMP level or equivalent evidence — required
• Validate continuous monitoring & IRP (72-hour breach notice) — required
• Review pen tests & SOC 2 reports — required
• Request subprocessors + SBOM — required
• Test data export & migration during pilot — required
• Negotiate SLA credits for enrollment downtime — required
• Include exit, escrow, and indemnity clauses — required

Closing: How procurement teams win

In 2026, security is not an afterthought — it’s a feature tied directly to enrollment outcomes, reputation, and legal risk. Use this FedRAMP-aware procurement checklist to separate vendors with real, auditable controls from those with marketing claims. Insist on documentation, run conversion-aware pilots, and tie payments to compliance milestones. Learning from market moves (like the acquisition of FedRAMP-enabled AI platforms in late 2025) helps you buy a product that’s resilient to strategic change.

Call to action

Need a customizable RFP template or a procurement workshop for your IT and enrollment teams? Contact our enrollment security specialists at enrollment.live for a guided vendor evaluation and a printable FedRAMP-aware checklist tailored to your institution’s risk profile. Protect student data and close more applicants — start your secure procurement now.

Related Reading

• What LLMs Won't Touch: Data Governance Limits for Generative Models in Advertising
• Audit Readiness for Real‑Time APIs: Performance Budgets, Caching Strategies and Compliance in 2026
• Sovereign Cloud and Your CRM: What EU Data Rules Mean for Customer Records
• Beyond Prompting: Production Pipelines for Text‑to‑Image at Scale in 2026
• Game-Day Playlist: Mixing Arirang, Bad Bunny, and Reggae to Keep Fans Pumped
• When a Tiny Drawing Makes Big Headlines: How Auction Discoveries Influence Print Demand
• How to Use Bluesky Cashtags to Teach Finance Concepts in Class
• 48-Hour Disney Park-Hop: Sample Itineraries + Cheapest Flight Routes in 2026
• Behind the Bottle: How a Small Syrup Maker Could Power Team-Branded Beverage Collabs